Is the "eventually" in the succession box because there was a period in which there was no Asahina daimyo, or because someone was daimyo between him and Sekawa? If it's the former, add the dates and the gap will be apparent, but if it's the latter, then Sekawa's name needs to be removed, because he would not, in fact, be Tamako's successor. ~ShibaRyu~ 17:23, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)
50,680
pages